McMeekin says welfare report getting push back

13 July 2013

By Daniel Nolan

Social Services Minister Ted McMeekin says a landmark report on reforming Ontario’s $8.3 billion welfare system is getting a rough ride from groups across the province.

The minister is in the midst of a 20-city tour gathering input to the 183-page report that came out last fall and was put together by commissioners Frances Lankin and Munir Sheikh. He says he’s also met with 118 groups since becoming minister in Premier Kathleen Wynne’s government in January.

The report contained 108 recommendations and chief among them was a proposal to merge Ontario Works and the Ontario Disability Support Program into a program delivered by municipalities.

“Many of these groups say, ‘Look, we are really pleased the report has been prepared,” the Hamilton-area MPP said. “It’s a watershed report, but we just don’t like what’s in it.”

The minister said that doesn’t mean the government will park it on a shelf. It is aiming to respond to it this fall with legislation, or other changes, but he admitted “there will be parts of the report I suspect will not be moved forward.” Some initiatives were passed in the budget.

“The jury is out on most of the Sheikh/Lankin report,” McMeekin said. “They came up with ideas that 80 per cent of the groups we talked don’t like. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out you better go back and start talking to people.”

The minister said merging OW and ODSP has drawn “a fair bit” of comment because stakeholders believe it will create “winners and losers” over the issue of benefits. He said he has “mixed feelings” about the recommendation.

He has not been surprised by the reaction. “Anytime there’s significant change you expect push back. That doesn’t mean you move ahead or that you stop. You take time to listen carefully to what people are saying so that you can make the best decision.”

Opinion: Putting a family face on homelessness

By Salena Kitteringham, Edmonton Journal July 9, 2013

At the end of June, my dad gave me the sad news that my uncle Roger was dead. He had died in 2010 in Thunder Bay, Ont., with no personal possessions, probably homeless as he had been living transient for about a decade.

As far as my father knew, no one from the funeral home had contacted anyone from the family. I don’t know if that is standard practice when a homeless person dies, but there was no phone call from the police as far as we know. Maybe my grandma had been contacted or maybe she didn’t know.

In either scenario, it doesn’t take a professional psychologist to see Roger’s homelessness as one of the factors weighing heavily on her heart when she took her own life in February 2011.

We only found out about Roger’s death because my uncle Dave had Googled Roger’s name, as he and I and many other family members had done so many times over the years. Only this particular time an obituary actually came up.

No doubt there were many volunteers over the years who served Roger Thanksgiving dinner and I do want to thank each and every one of them.

I would, however, want them to understand that his reason for being was not simply to make them feel fortunate and good about themselves, and that on the other 364 days of the year, when he was out of their minds, pretty much invisible to them, he remained on my mind.

I would tell them that Roger had a big family that loved him. My dad’s half-brother brought together two families. He was my uncle but only six years older than me, so he was more like a big brother.

I would tell them how he loved heavy metal, and even though he was a banger, it was Roger who bought me Madonna’s True Blue on cassette.

I would tell them how he once filled a shoebox with candy for my birthday when I turned nine. Bubble gum tape. Lollipops. Nerds.

And I would tell them how it was with Roger on a cloudy August afternoon on the deck in my parents’ backyard that I shared my first legal beer. Of course that wasn’t our first beer together.

Was he tattooed?

Yes. He had a lot of great art, including a terrifying death metal clown face and a third eye that watched his back from spraying bullets when he turned 19 in Bosnia while wearing a blue UN peacekeeper’s helmet.

I would tell them how in the letters he wrote to me, then a 14-year-old girl in Red Deer, that he said, “There is no telling the good guys from the bad guys in Bosnia. They all rape the other’s women.”

I would tell them that he came back to us a broken man at 20. How he couldn’t hold down a job. That he lived in our basement and slept on our couch for weeks at a time.

Was he diseased?

Yes. When he crashed his motorcycle, the CT scan showed an inoperable tumour.

I would tell them how he refused what little treatment they could have given him and how he just upped and left us, leaving a fully furnished apartment vacant. He just went.

I would tell them how private investigators were hired when the police stopped looking for him, how my uncle Dave once found him living in a park in Calgary.

I would tell them how the police called to tell us his vehicle was left abandoned in Toronto, and how the Salvation Army shelter called my grandma one time to tell her that he was OK.

Was he to blame for his lifestyle? Not unless you can prove heavy metal causes brain cancer.

I’ve decided to share this personal information with the hopes that it might put a human face on homelessness at a time when very narrow perspectives are being shared very widely by Terwillegar residents concerned about an affordable housing complex going into their community.

Homelessness cuts close to the bone for me, even as I sit comfortably in my own affluent home, deep in southwest Edmonton. I won’t sit here in silence anymore about how hurtful, upsetting, narrow-minded and just plain wrong have been many of the comments posted on Terwillegar Speaks concerning the homeless.

What I would like to say to those people is this: The City of Edmonton is committed to ending homelessness in the next decade. It will take more than serving Thanksgiving dinner once a year to make it happen.

If you are not prepared to be changed by new information, open your hearts and community to people who were formerly homeless, people who are turning their lives around, people who are gainfully employed and will be paying rent to live in your community, perhaps it is you who are in the wrong place.

To those of you concerned about the affordable housing project bringing your property values down — you’ve already done a great job of driving perceptions about your neighbourhood to an all-time low.

To those of you who say you are not affluent, I say there are many people in Edmonton who make more money than you do, and plenty more who make less, but if your wealth depends on keeping others poor, then you will never truly be wealthy.

Call me idealistic — I’ve been called worse — but I have to believe Terwillegar Speaks represents a very vocal but very minor number of people’s views in that part of my city.

Salena Kitteringham is an Edmonton freelance writer and regular contributor to the Journal’s Arts & Life section.

Landlords helping homeless find affordable housing in Calgary

By Jason van Rassel, Calgary Herald July 11, 2013

Private landlords are teaming up with Calgary’s non-profit sector to make it easier to find stable housing for people emerging from homelessness.

The Calgary Residential Rental Association is challenging its members to make 500 units available for social agencies to place their clients over the next year.

“From our perspective, it’s going to provide a hand up to people who need a hand up,” said rental association executive director Gerry Baxter, whose organization represents 600 landlords with a portfolio of approximately 50,000 units.

Right now, not many of them are vacant; the city’s vacancy rate is sitting at 1.2 per cent. The rental market is expected to get even tighter as people displaced by last month’s flooding search for new places to live and landlords repair damaged properties.

“I don’t think we’ve seen the full impact of what the flood will do — prior to that, we were struggling, too,” said Carlene Donnelly, executive director of Calgary Urban Project Society.

The agreement announced Wednesday between the CRRA and the Calgary Homeless Foundation is designed to give landlords incentives to rent to clients of eight city agencies.

In exchange for landlords offering units to low-income clients, the agencies agree to provide rent assurances, pay security deposits and cover any additional damage, if necessary.

The landlords charge and receive market value rents, but the agreement protects them from defaults or damage.

“If something happens and the tenant doesn’t pay the rent, the landlord has an opportunity to go back to the caseworker at the agency,” Baxter said.

The tenants get a decent place to live, along with support from the agency that referred them. Some may need ongoing help with monthly rental subsidies, while others may simply need assistance coming up with the damage deposit, Donnelly said.

The homeless foundation and a coalition of local non-profit agencies are part of a 10-year plan to end homelessness in Calgary by 2018.

Since the start of the plan in 2008, the CHF estimates it has found permanent homes for approximately 4,500 people.

A portion of that success has been realized through some existing relationships Calgary landlords have with the city’s non-profit sector.

Rod Williams of Gil Property Management and Sales estimated he has rented units to approximately 100 clients of local agencies in the past five years.

“My comfort level is due to the fact I got fairly familiar with the housing advocates with these agencies,” Williams said.

Only a few tenants didn’t work out, and when that happened, the agencies responded, said Williams.

“If everything had gone to hell, we wouldn’t be doing this,” he said.

Williams added that wealthy tenants who have rented his properties on the open market have also defaulted or caused damage — and in those cases, his company didn’t have the same recourse it has with the non-profit agencies it works with.

“You can’t judge people by their income — or lack thereof,” he said.

Donnelly agreed the non-profit sector and property owners already have a strong relationship, but said the new agreement will hopefully bolster it at a time when the rental market is so tight.

“We really do need a plan,” she said.

In addition to CUPS, the Mustard Seed, Alpha House Calgary, the Calgary John Howard Society, The Alex, Aspen Family and Community Network Society, Keys to Recovery and the Calgary Drop-In Centre are involved in the program.

Smoking to be banned inside Grey housing units

By Denis Langlois, Sun Times, Owen Sound

Monday, July 8, 2013 5:22:45 EDT PM

Three fires over eight months in 2012 at Grey County-owned housing buildings has prompted the upper-tier government to move to ban smoking inside residential units.

A no-smoking clause will be included in all lease agreements — signed by new tenants and tenants that have transferred to another unit — starting Jan. 1, 2014.

Existing tenants will be “grandfathered” and can continue to smoke in their units for the length of their tenancy, unless they opt to sign a no-smoking policy addendum to their lease, said Grey County housing director Rod Wyatt.

The new policy will also ban smoking outdoors within five metres of any windows, doors, patios or balconies.

“We’ve been considering this for a couple years now,” Wyatt said in a recent interview.

“Certainly the fires gave us the impetus to move forward at this time.”

The county owns 888 residential units. About half are located in Owen Sound, with others in communities like Hanover, Flesherton, Dundalk and Meaford.

One unit was destroyed and two others were heavily damaged after a fire broke out May 25, 2012, at the Alpha St. townhouse complex in Owen Sound. No one was injured in the blaze.

Nearly two months later, fire crews responded to a blaze at county-owned Lemon Court at 85 Lemon St. in Thornbury. One unit was severely damaged. A tenant was taken to hospital as a precaution and two were displaced.

The third fire resulted in the death of an elderly man, which heavily damaged a unit Dec. 15 at the county-owned Maple Villa apartment complex at 81 Bruce St.

Wyatt said the July and December fires were both caused by “careless smoking.” The Alpha St. fire was ignited by a stove, but evidence of “unsafe smoking” was found in the unit, he said.

He said the county has received an increased number of complaints from tenants about the impact of secondhand smoking.

The Smoke Free Ontario Act already bans people from smoking in common areas of multi-unit dwellings, which include hallways, lobbies, elevators and stairways.